Official Journal of The Academy of Osseointegration
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Scaling and Root Planing In Vivo Using Hand vs Rotary Instruments
Serge Dibart, DMD/Diego Capri, DDS/Piero Casavecchia, MD, DDS/Martha Nunn, DDS, PhD/Ziedonis Skobe, PhD
PMID: 15446407
DOI: 10.11607/prd.00.0589
The purpose of the present investigation was to compare the effectiveness of a scaling bur and conventional Gracey curettes in vivo. Ten teeth scheduled for extraction were scaled and root planed thoroughly before extraction. The instrumented areas were observed using SEM. Scaling with a No. 12 fluted carbide bur was more effective in removing debris and plaque than were conventional Gracey curettes. Because of the aggressive nature of the process, a certain learning curve is necessary to get accustomed to bur scaling; otherwise, dentinal hypersensitivity and patient discomfort may be increased. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:370–377.)
© 2020 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc |
PRD Home Current Issue Ahead of Print Archive Author Guidelines About |
Submission Form Submit Reprints Permission Advertising |
Quintessence Home Terms of Use Privacy Policy About Us Contact Us Help |